BBC reported just 30 minutes ago on a podcast that Hollywood actor Chris Pratt made headlines after publicly defending his wife’s cousin, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., while voicing support for some of Kennedy’s political plans. Pratt argued that RFK Jr.’s ideas deserve to be heard and evaluated on their own merits rather than dismissed outright due to the increasingly hostile and polarized climate of American politics.
During the podcast, the Guardians of the Galaxy star laid out his position clearly: “Be rational. You can’t just reject everything simply because it comes from Robert F. Kennedy Jr., when this country has already been divided like never before by the most divisive President in modern history.” Pratt did not name anyone directly, but listeners quickly understood his comments as a reference to the charged political environment of recent years.
Pratt acknowledged that he does not agree with all of RFK Jr.’s positions, particularly on controversial issues surrounding public health and science. Still, he emphasized the importance of maintaining a fair space for debate rather than turning opponents into enemies. “We have to be mature enough to listen, to analyze, and to critique based on reason, not just outrage or political labels,” he said.
The remarks quickly gained traction online, sparking divided reactions among Pratt’s fan base. Some argued that openly voicing political views could endanger his career, which depends heavily on public perception and Hollywood’s image-driven industry. Others praised him for speaking his mind, pointing out that few celebrities are willing to risk controversy by engaging with such sensitive topics.
What makes this moment particularly striking is that Chris Pratt rarely speaks out on political issues. He is better known for focusing on his acting, family life, and charitable work. His decision to publicly defend RFK Jr. therefore came as a surprise to many and underscores the personal connection—RFK Jr. is the cousin of Pratt’s wife, Katherine Schwarzenegger, the daughter of Arnold Schwarzenegger.
According to the BBC, Pratt’s comments not only place him at the center of public debate but may also give RFK Jr.’s campaign a boost. Kennedy has been seeking to distinguish himself as an outsider alternative to the traditional two-party system, and the indirect endorsement from a Hollywood A-lister could draw new attention from voters who might otherwise overlook his candidacy.
It remains unclear whether Pratt will continue to elaborate on his political stance in the future. For now, his intervention has already stirred discussion, both in entertainment circles and the wider political arena. As the U.S. presidential race grows increasingly heated, Pratt’s decision to step into the conversation ensures that his words will remain part of the debate for days to come.
Potential impact on Pratt’s Hollywood career
Industry observers note that Hollywood has historically leaned progressive, and public support for controversial figures can sometimes create tension for actors. By defending RFK Jr., Pratt risks alienating producers, studios, or co-stars who may prefer to avoid politically charged associations. Past examples have shown that even subtle political remarks can lead to backlash or calls for boycotts, particularly in an era of heightened polarization.
However, the opposite outcome is also possible. Pratt has built a reputation as a relatable, family-oriented star with crossover appeal to both mainstream audiences and more conservative-leaning viewers. His willingness to voice an independent opinion, especially while emphasizing rational debate, could strengthen his authenticity and connection with fans who feel alienated by Hollywood’s tendency to stay in a “safe lane.” In an industry where genuine voices are increasingly rare, Pratt might carve out a unique identity as someone unafraid to bridge divides.
For now, it is too early to know whether Pratt’s words will bring professional consequences or prove to be a temporary media storm. What is clear is that his podcast remarks have ensured him an unexpected role in the broader political conversation—one that could follow him well beyond the movie screen.